Cost Trends

LLM Prices Fell 80% Last Year. Your Bill Doubled Anyway. Here's Why.

July 18, 20267 min readLLMtrack Blog

This is part of our guide to controlling your LLM bill.

Quick answer: LLM inference costs fell roughly 80% from 2023-2025. Despite this, the average production SaaS bill for AI features doubled. The reason: cheaper tokens enable more features, which drives more calls, and usage growth outpaces the price drops — a pattern now called "LLMflation."

The LLMflation Trap Explained

Every major provider has cut per-token pricing repeatedly since 2023. GPT-4-class pricing alone dropped roughly 80% peak to trough once mini and flash tiers launched. On paper, that should make AI features cheaper to run every single quarter.

In practice, cheaper tokens change product behavior. A feature that was too expensive to ship at $6 per 1,000 requests becomes trivial to ship at $0.20. Teams add streaming, add retries, add multi-step agent chains, add a second model call to "double check" the first one. Usage volume grows 3-5x faster than price falls, so total monthly spend keeps climbing even while the per-token line falls.

-80%price per token, 2023-2025
+100%avg production SaaS AI bill, 2025
30%/yrusage growth ceiling for net savings

Interactive: LLMflation Simulator

Price vs. bill, 2023-2027

Price per token (falling) Total bill (your usage)
35%

The 30-40% Waste Number

Falling prices mask a separate problem: waste. Across production LLM deployments, 30-40% of spend is typically recoverable without any feature changes. The waste breaks into three repeatable categories — duplicate requests that never hit a cache, the wrong model tier selected by default for a task, and bloated context windows carrying tokens nobody reads. None of these require a price cut from the provider. They require visibility into what you're actually sending.

Interactive: Waste Audit Estimator

Estimate your recoverable waste

Duplicate requests
$0
Wrong model tier
$0
Context bloat
$0

The Governance Solution

Falling prices reward teams that watch usage, not teams that wait for the next price cut. Governance means feature-level attribution, model-tier rules, and alerts before a usage spike becomes a quarter-end surprise. Without that visibility, every price cut just subsidizes more unmonitored growth.

// Track every request with feature + model so growth is visible per surface
fetch('https://llm-track.com/api/ingest', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'x-api-key': process.env.LLMTRACK_KEY },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    provider: 'openai',
    model: response.model,
    feature_name: 'agent-chain-step-2',
    total_tokens: response.usage.total_tokens,
    latency_ms: Date.now() - startedAt,
    status: 'success'
  })
}).catch(() => {})

The Forecast Advantage

Teams that track spend daily can see the usage-growth curve weeks before it crosses budget. That advance warning is the real defense against LLMflation — not waiting for the next round of price cuts, but knowing your own growth rate well enough to act before it outpaces them.

Warning: A falling price-per-token chart from your provider tells you nothing about your bill. Only your own usage trend does.
You cannot manage what you cannot see.

Track feature-level usage growth before the next price cut convinces you everything is fine.

Start tracking free →

FAQ

Most likely yes, in line with the trend since 2023. That does not guarantee your bill falls — usage growth is the variable that actually decides your invoice.

Most production deployments without caching or model-tier rules can recover 30-40% of spend without changing any feature behavior.

Daily spend growth rate by feature. A feature growing faster than 30%/month will outpace any price cut within a year.

See your real usage growth — not just the price trend

Start free. One async call. No proxy and no credit card required.

Start free →